in

Britain’s biggest doctors’ union the BMA drops its 15-year opposition to assisted dying

Spread the love


Dr John Chisholm, chair of the BMA's medical ethics committee, said the neutral position means the association will not lobby for or against a change in the law, but represent the views, interested and concerns express by its members.

Dr John Chisholm, chair of the BMA’s medical ethics committee, said the neutral position means the association will not lobby for or against a change in the law, but represent the views, interested and concerns express by its members.

The UK’s biggest union for doctors has dropped its 15-year stance against assisted dying.

The British Medical Association, which represents around 150,000 members, held the vote after a survey last year revealed the majority supported a change to the law.

Some 302 members of the BMA’s representative body participated in the landmark vote and a slim majority backed the change of stance.

Around half of them voted in favour of holding a neutral stance on assisted dying, while 48 per cent were against it and 3 per cent abstained.  

But, it assisted dying becomes legal, they said they would support medics’ right to refuse prescribing lethal doses of medication to patients if they object to the practice.  

Euthanasia – ending someone’s life to relieve their suffering, such as a doctor deliberately giving a patient an overdose – and assisted suicide – helping another person to commit suicide – are both illegal across the UK.

But a bill to legalise assisted dying is currently before the Scottish Parliament, after it was brought forwards by a Liberal Democrat MP in June.

Assisted dying sparks strong debate from both sides, with some arguing that no one should be intentionally deprived of their right to live.

But others arguing the blanket ban causes needless suffering for patients and their families. 

Dr John Chisholm, chair of the BMA’s medical ethics committee, said the association’s neutral position means the association will not lobby for or against a change in the law, but ‘represent the views, interested and concerns’ expressed by its members. 

Some 302 members of the BMA's representative body, out of the 560 eligible, participated in the landmark vote. Some 49 per cent supported a change in stance, while 48 per cent were against it and three per cent abstained from the vote

Some 302 members of the BMA’s representative body, out of the 560 eligible, participated in the landmark vote. Some 49 per cent supported a change in stance, while 48 per cent were against it and three per cent abstained from the vote

Doctors and medical student representatives at the BMA’s annual representative meeting, which was held virtually, debated the issue today and passed a motion for the association not to take a stance for or against changing the law on assisted dying. 

Just 54 per cent of the 560 members of BMA’s representative body, who were eligible to participate in the poll, decided to vote.

While the body passed the motion to support people choosing to end their life, they also said they would safeguard healthcare workers right to refuse engaging in the act. 

The vast majority (79 per cent) voted in favour of healthcare staff being given the right not to assisted someone to die – such as by providing a lethal dose of medication – if the law changes.

But 72 per cent said medics who object to assisted dying should still provide factual information to any decision-making body about the practice.

And doctors who would refuse to provide assisted dying services, if it becomes legal, should refer patients seeking that form of care to another medic, the majority said.

The series of votes follow on from a poll by the BMA last year on whether there should be a change in the law to permit doctors to prescribe life-ending drugs to eligible patients.

Some 40 per cent said they think the association should actively support attempts to change the law, a third said it should opposes assisted dying and 20 per cent said the BMA should adopt a neutral position.

And in that poll, half of surveyed members said they personally believe the law should change to allow doctors to prescribe life-ending drugs, while four in 10 were against it and 11 per cent were undecided.

Dr John Chisholm, BMA medical ethics committee chair, said:

‘Assisted dying is a highly emotive and sensitive topic that inspires a broad spectrum of views and opinions both across the wider public and among the medical profession, for whom any change of law would have a profound impact.

What is the law on assisted dying? 

There are two types of assisted dying identified by the NHS, but both are illegal.

Euthanasia is the act of deliberately ending a person’s life to relieve suffering, such as a doctor deliberately giving a patient with a terminal illness a drug with the aim of ending their life.

Assisted suicide is when someone helps another person to kill themselves, such as providing a family member with a fatal amount of medication, while knowing they plan to use it to commit suicide.

Both forms of assisted dying are illegal under laws across the UK. 

But a bill to legalise the practice in Scotland was brought forward by a Liberal Democrat MP Liam McArthur in June.

‘As evidenced by the results of our recent survey of the profession and in today’s in-depth debate, doctors have a wide range of personal views on this important issue, and as such representatives have decided that the most appropriate position for the BMA, as the professional body which represents all doctors and medical students in the UK, to hold is to be neutral on the topic.

‘This is an important day for the BMA and the medical profession, clearly demonstrating that we as an organisation are listening to our wider membership on such a crucial issue, and developing policy based on their valuable feedback.

‘Moving to a position of neutrality means that the BMA will not lobby for or against a change in the law, but far from remaining silent on the issue, we will continue to represent the views, interests and concerns expressed by our members.’

On the need for healthcare workers to have the right to conscientiously object to participation, Dr Chisholm added: ‘Indeed, as with many other issues that ignite such deeply held personal beliefs in healthcare staff, it is vital that these are respected and protected should there be any change in law.

‘The need for the right of doctors to conscientiously object to participation in physician-assisted dying was something that was made overwhelmingly clear not just in today’s discussions, but also in the results to our survey, which found that 93% of respondents supported this.’

Dr Gillian Wright said: ‘This motion is actually about euthanasia, the BMA defines physician-assisted dying as assisted suicide and euthanasia.

‘We know that neutrality means tacit approval and has enormous political significance.’

The move was welcomed by some campaign groups, with Dignity in Dying chief executive Sarah Wootton branding it ‘a victory for common sense’.

She said: ‘This is an historic decision and a victory for common-sense.

‘It brings the BMA in line with a growing number of medical bodies in the UK and around the world that truly represent the range of views that healthcare professionals hold on assisted dying.

‘By adopting a position of engaged neutrality the BMA can now proudly and accurately advocate on behalf of its members, while sending a message to Parliament that assisted dying is, rightly, an issue for society, where the views of dying people and their loved ones should be heard loud and clear.’

But Care Not Killing chief executive Dr Gordon Macdonald said that current laws protect vulnerable people and do not need changing.

He added: ‘We are naturally disappointed at the divisive nature of this vote as it exposes the divide between doctors who care for patients at their end of life, whether in hospitals or hospices, who oppose assisted suicide and euthanasia and those medics who work in unrelated discipline such as child and adolescent psychiatry and occupational health.

‘As the BMA’s own survey found, doctors at the coal face who deliver care to the elderly and terminally ill, who work in palliative care, geriatric medicine and general practice continue to oppose assisted suicide and euthanasia, because they know it is not needed and the subtle pressure it could put on patients to end their lives prematurely.’



Source link

What do you think?

Written by bourbiza

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Cold, Frightened and Armed: In Myanmar’s Jungles, a Struggling Resistance

Boris Johnson will not take bereavement leave following death of his mother